Skip to main content
· 1/31/1990

Smith v. McIntire (In Re Smith)

Citations

  • 110 B.R. 597
  • 1990 Bankr. LEXIS 313
  • 1990 WL 12265

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • UFTA should not be applied retroactively and to do so may even violate constitutional principles
  • specifically rejects Gherman reasoning and follows Warner.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alexander L. Paskay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.