Smith v. McDonald
Citations
- 42 Cal. 484
Syllabus
<p>Appearance for Inpant DEPENDANTS by Geneeal Guardian.—Where, in a suit against infants, there was no personal service upon them, but their general guardian appeared and defended for them: held, that such appearance gave the Court jurisdiction of their persons.</p> <p>Doctrine op Stare Decisis. — When a rule, by which the title to real property is to be determined, has become established by positive law or by deliberate judicial decision, its inherent correctness or incorrectness, its justice or injustice, in the abstract, are of far less importance than that it should, itself, be constant and invariable.</p>
Judges: Crockett, Wallace
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Gerhard v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court· 1968-07-09· cited 112×
- Emeric v. AlvaradoCalifornia Supreme Court· 1884-01-31· cited 83×
- State Ex Rel. Bliss v. DorityNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1950-12-22· cited 58×
- Monroe v. FohlCalifornia Supreme Court· 1887-06-21· cited 23×
- Duncan v. BrownNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1914-02-12· cited 20×
- Kapiolani Estate, Ltd. v. AtcherlyHawaii Supreme Court· 1903-04-07· cited 20×
- Redmond v. PetersonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1894-06-02· cited 15×
- Richardson v. LoupeCalifornia Supreme Court· 1889-09-12· cited 9×
- Western Lumber Co. v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1892-03-26· cited 5×
- Green v. TenoldNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1905-01-11· cited 5×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.