Gerhard v. Stephens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• for purposes of determining whether the interest can be abandoned, easements and profits are \indistinguishable\
• \[a] profit à prendre [is] an incorporeal hereditament. . . . essentially indistinguishable from [an] easement\
• California law prohibits the unauthorized practice of law “to afford protection against persons who are not qualified to practice the profession”
• “[A] person illegally 3 contracting to practice law may not recover compensation for his services.”
• ‘[a] profit a prendre [is] an incorporeal hereditament .... essentially indistinguishable from [an] easement’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).