Smith v. Mahoney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]t is our bounden duty to view the legislative enactment under consideration . . . and sustain it, unless we are convinced beyond reasonable doubt that it is clearly in conflict with the constitutional provision.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Local 266, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1954-10-18· cited 63×
• Giss v. Jordan
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1957-04-06· cited 46×
• Flynn v. City & County of San Francisco
  California Supreme Court· 1941-07-02· cited 37×
• County of Harris v. Shepperd
  Texas Supreme Court· 1956-05-02· cited 35×
• State of Arizona v. Christopher Arevalo
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2020-09-01· cited 20×
• America West Airlines, Inc. v. Deparment of Revenue
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1994-09-13· cited 19×
• Hunt v. Douglas Lumber Co.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1933-01-05· cited 17×
• State v. Double Seven Corporation
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1950-06-19· cited 13×
• State ex rel. City of Bozeman v. Police Court
  Montana Supreme Court· 1923-10-15· cited 13×
• Home Accident Insurance v. Industrial Commission
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1928-07-18· cited 11×
• Bonito Partners, LLC v. City of Flagstaff
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-02-21· cited 7×
• City of Phoenix v. Sun Valley Bus Lines, Inc.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1946-06-28· cited 4×
• State v. Pepper
  Montana Supreme Court· 1924-06-11· cited 4×
• Bertagnole v. Nicholson
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1932-02-03· cited 1×

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lochner v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1905-04-17· cited 1,236×
• Geer v. Connecticut
  Supreme Court· 1896-03-02· cited 399×
• McCready v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1877-04-30· cited 261×
• Royall v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1886-02-01· cited 64×
• State ex rel. Wyatt v. Ashbrook
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1900-02-20· cited 64×
• Ellis v. Frazier
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1901-01-28· cited 37×
• Pitts v. City of Vicksburg
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1894-10-15· cited 9×
• State v. Ashman
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1910-12-15· cited 9×
• Livingston v. City Council
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1870-06-15· cited 8×
• People v. Setunsky
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1910-06-06· cited 7×
• Mestayer v. Corrige
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1886-07-15· cited 5×
• State v. Smith
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1903-07-06· cited 4×
• State v. Tower
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1892-04-15· cited 2×
• Allen v. Wyckoff
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1886-02-15· cited 1×