Texas Supreme Court· 12/14/1910
Smith v. Jones
Citations
- 132 S.W. 469
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “We . . . do not agree that it is always true that a possession, in order to be sufficient, must be adverse to the whole world.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Orsborn v. Deep Rock Oil Corp.Texas Supreme Court· 1954-03-31· cited 166×
- Lone Star Steel Company v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1957-03-07· cited 22×
- Fielder v. Houston Oil Co. of TexasTexas Commission of Appeals· 1919-01-15· cited 18×
- Jefferies v. BenavidesCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1949-03-03· cited 7×
- Fear v. BarwiseSupreme Court of Kansas· 1914-10-10· cited 7×
- Waddell v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1951-10-25· cited 3×
- Moran v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1943-04-07· cited 2×
- Turnham v. SawyerCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1949-05-13· cited 1×
- Nesbitt v. GarvinCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1957-12-10· cited 1×
- Patten v. RodgersCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1967-08-01· cited 1×
- Reid Estates Civic Club v. Boyer, Inc.: Lonestar Prestress Mfg., Inc. Mark L. Boyer Laureen Boyer John L Boyer And Lyda BoyerTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2011-12-29
- Richardson v. BallFifth Circuit· 1917-12-06
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Bracken v. JonesTexas Supreme Court· 1885-01-30· cited 104×
- Craig v. CartwrightTexas Supreme Court· 1886-02-05· cited 84×
- Charle v. SaffoldTexas Supreme Court· 1854-07-01· cited 37×
- Moore v. BrownfieldWashington Supreme Court· 1893-07-12· cited 25×
- Mather v. WalshSupreme Court of Missouri· 1891-10-15· cited 23×
- Altschul v. O'NeillOregon Supreme Court· 1899-08-07· cited 21×
- French Live Stock Co. v. SpringerOregon Supreme Court· 1899-08-11· cited 18×
- Francoeur v. NewhouseU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California· 1890-08-06· cited 15×
- Northern Pac. R. Co. v. KranichU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Montana· 1892-11-14· cited 10×
- Skipwith v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1887-11-15· cited 8×
- Missouri Lumber & Mining Co. v. JewellSupreme Court of Missouri· 1906-12-22· cited 7×
- Beale v. HiteOregon Supreme Court· 1899-05-29· cited 6×
- Bracken v. Union Pac. Ry. Co.Eighth Circuit· 1896-03-30· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.