Mather v. Walsh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing when parties disputed before arbitrator whether contract language was ambiguous, arbitrator found language ambiguous, and we disagreed
• reviewing the language of a contract de novo and concluding that the panel erred when it considered extrinsic evidence because the contract was not ambiguous
• “[W]e will reverse the determination of the fact finder where, although the terms of the agreement are unambiguous, the fact finder has relied improperly upon extrinsic evidence in reaching a determination contrary to the unambiguous language of the agreement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).