Skip to main content

Smith v. Jenkins

Citations

  • 562 A.2d 610
  • 1989 D.C. App. LEXIS 133
  • 1989 WL 78916

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that, where appellant raised the same sequence of events in a subsequent suit, the factual nuclei were “related in time, space, origin, and motivation”
  • barring two limited partners from bringing action for misrepresentation against former general partner because same claims had been previously litigated on behalf of partnership by another general partner
  • “Smith’s nonparticipation in that suit does not negate the fact that he was in privity with parties who actually represented his interests.... ”
  • same; in addition, finding privity based on at least partial control over any decision to appeal
  • “[I]ssue preclusion operates to bar relitigation of identical issues actually decided between the parties or their privies.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: MacK, Newman, Schwelb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

63 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.