District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 7/6/1989
Smith v. Jenkins
Citations
- 562 A.2d 610
- 1989 D.C. App. LEXIS 133
- 1989 WL 78916
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that, where appellant raised the same sequence of events in a subsequent suit, the factual nuclei were “related in time, space, origin, and motivation”
- barring two limited partners from bringing action for misrepresentation against former general partner because same claims had been previously litigated on behalf of partnership by another general partner
- “Smith’s nonparticipation in that suit does not negate the fact that he was in privity with parties who actually represented his interests.... ”
- same; in addition, finding privity based on at least partial control over any decision to appeal
- “[I]ssue preclusion operates to bar relitigation of identical issues actually decided between the parties or their privies.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: MacK, Newman, Schwelb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
63 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Smalls, Eugene C. v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 2006-12-19· cited 321×
- John Stanton v. District of Columbia Court of AppealsD.C. Circuit· 1997-12-03· cited 268×
- Washington Medical Center, Inc. v. HolleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-05-03· cited 95×
- Larry Harmon v. Ben GordonSeventh Circuit· 2013-03-21· cited 74×
- Oubre v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-08-26· cited 61×
- Patton v. KleinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1999-05-20· cited 54×
- Carr v. RoseDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-10-09· cited 44×
- Faulkner v. Government Employees Insurance Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-12-30· cited 41×
- Davis v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-08-07· cited 40×
- Molovinsky v. Monterey Cooperative, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-01-30· cited 34×
- Gilles v. WareDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-10-06· cited 33×
- Modiri v. 1342 Restaurant Group, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-08-10· cited 30×
- Shin v. Portals Confederation Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1999-04-22· cited 27×
- Kauffman v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2008-06-12· cited 26×
- Major v. Inner City Property Management, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-01-30· cited 24×
- Maxson v. Travis County Rent AccountTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1999-11-18· cited 21×
- Herrion v. Children'S Hospital Natl. Medical CenterDistrict of Columbia· 2011-05-24· cited 21×
- Newell v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1999-11-24· cited 21×
- Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-12-29· cited 19×
- Century International Arms, Ltd. v. Federal State Unitary Enterprise State Corp. 'Rosvoorouzhenie'District of Columbia· 2001-10-22· cited 18×
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court· 1979-01-09· cited 4,229×
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1979-02-22· cited 3,633×
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court· 1971-05-03· cited 2,250×
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court· 1969-05-19· cited 2,097×
- Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.Supreme Court· 1955-06-06· cited 1,049×
- Old Colony Trust Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court· 1929-06-03· cited 885×
- Agarwal v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1979-12-07· cited 357×
- Kaspar Wire Works, Inc. v. Leco Engineering and MacHine Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1978-06-21· cited 332×
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SchendelSupreme Court· 1926-04-12· cited 285×
- Cobb v. Standard Drug Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1982-11-10· cited 201×
- Souffront v. La Compagnie Des Sucreries De Porto RicoSupreme Court· 1910-05-16· cited 150×
- Schnell v. Peter Eckrich & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court· 1961-02-20· cited 146×
- Jackson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1980-11-13· cited 146×
- Jefferson School of Social Science v. Subversive Activities Control BoardD.C. Circuit· 1963-12-17· cited 59×
- William Thomas Roach v. Teamsters Local Union No. 688, a Labor Organization, Alfred D. Russom v. Teamsters Local Union No. 688, a Labor OrganizationEighth Circuit· 1979-04-26· cited 58×
- Henderson v. Snider Bros., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1981-12-16· cited 50×
- Smith v. JenkinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1982-10-13· cited 41×
- Clark v. TaylorSecond Circuit· 1947-10-15· cited 39×
- Parker v. SteinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-05-12· cited 31×
- Jonathan Woodner Co. v. AdamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1987-10-28· cited 22×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.