Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 4/15/1918

Smith v. Jackson

Citations

  • 246 U.S. 388
  • 38 S. Ct. 353
  • 62 L. Ed. 788
  • 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1558

Syllabus

<p>The Auditor for the Canal Zone has no authority to make deductions for rent of quarters, and because of absence, from the salary of the District Judge of the Zone, as fixed and appropriated for by Congress.</p> <p>Intimated that, but for the character of the proceeding (mandamus) and doubt as to intent, damages would have been inflicted on the Auditor under Rule 23, for plain abuse of administrative discretion in prosecuting this writ of error after being advised,by an opinion of the Attorney General and two decisions of the courts below of his manifest duty under the statutp' respecting the payment of the judge’s salary.</p>

Judges: White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.