Mine Safety Appliances Co. v. Forrestal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing the action because the government was a required-entity sovereign that did not consent to be sued and could not be joined
• dismissing an action where the Under Secretary of the Navy was sued in his official capacity, because the Government was a required entity that could not be joined when it withheld consent to be sued
• dismissing an action where the Under Secretary of the Navy was sued in his official capacity, because the Government was a required entity that could not be joined when it withheld consent to be sued
• dismissing a suit where the Under Secretary of the Navy was sued in his official capacity and was required to be joined, but could not be joined because the Government withheld consent to be sued
• dismissing an action where the Under Secretary of the Navy was sued in his official capacity, because the Government was a required entity that could not be joined when it withheld consent to be sued
• dismissing an action where the Under Secretary of the Navy was sued in his official capacity, because the Government was a required entity that could not be joined when it withheld consent to be sued

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).