California Court of Appeal· 9/30/1965
Smith v. Hill
Citations
- 237 Cal. App. 2d 374
- 47 Cal. Rptr. 49
- 1965 Cal. App. LEXIS 1264
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- amount actually paid for repairs is evidence of reasonable value of necessary repairs, but estimated repair cost call for expert testimony
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Whelan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court· 1968-07-11· cited 846×
- Geddes & Smith, Inc. v. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court· 1965-11-24· cited 60×
- Berman v. KarvounisCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-01-02· cited 56×
- Hand Electronics, Inc. v. Snowline Joint Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1994-01-10· cited 20×
- Waller v. BrooksCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1968-11-13· cited 14×
- Martinez v. RobledoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2012-10-23· cited 12×
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. MounteerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1977-02-07· cited 10×
- Design Built Sys. v. SorokineCalifornia Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2019-02-26· cited 6×
- People v. YanezCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1995-08-03· cited 5×
- Association of Home Owners of Kai Nui Court Ex Rel. Board of Directors v. City & County of HonoluluHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2008-02-28· cited 2×
- Design Built Systems v. SorokineCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2019-02-27
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Atlantic Trust Co. v. ChapmanSupreme Court· 1908-02-24· cited 170×
- Beeler v. American Trust Co.California Supreme Court· 1944-04-03· cited 141×
- Freedman v. Rector, Wardens & Vestrymen of St. Matthias ParishCalifornia Supreme Court· 1951-04-27· cited 139×
- Richter v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1951-01-26· cited 137×
- Luz v. LopesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1960-12-22· cited 135×
- Wright v. BestCalifornia Supreme Court· 1942-02-03· cited 67×
- Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court· 1949-07-01· cited 67×
- Lifton v. HarshmanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1947-06-18· cited 60×
- Pfingsten v. WestenhaverCalifornia Supreme Court· 1952-05-13· cited 55×
- Baffa v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1950-03-24· cited 46×
- Malinson v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1948-01-27· cited 45×
- Owsley v. HamnerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1951-02-09· cited 42×
- Gonzalez v. HiroseCalifornia Supreme Court· 1948-12-23· cited 30×
- Petersen v. RidenourCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1955-09-28· cited 29×
- Harriman v. TetikCalifornia Supreme Court· 1961-11-16· cited 29×
- Reeves v. HutsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1956-09-14· cited 26×
- Moriarty v. CarlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1960-08-22· cited 23×
- Link Belt Machinery Co. v. HughesIllinois Supreme Court· 1902-02-21· cited 18×
- Baldwin v. BaldwinCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1947-12-12· cited 16×
- Kay v. KayCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1961-01-13· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.