Smith v. Gray

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It may be conceded that the majority stockholders are bound not to act fraudulently or in bad faith, but, where the acts of the majority are neither fraudulent nor ultra vires, the minority or dissenting stockholders have no ground of complaint.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bankers Trust Company, a Corporation v. Pacific Employers Insurance Company, a Corporation, and the Century Insurance Company, Limited, a Corporation
  Ninth Circuit· 1960-08-24· cited 66×
• Cohen v. Mirage Resorts, Inc.
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2003-02-07· cited 42×
• Hollis v. Hill
  Fifth Circuit· 2000-11-17· cited 41×
• Tomiyasu v. Golden
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1965-03-30· cited 21×
• Skelly v. Dockweiler
  S.D. California· 1947-12-05· cited 14×
• Virgin Islands Taxi Ass'n v. West Indian Co.
  Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2017-03-22· cited 7×
• Lucas v. Page
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1975-07-31· cited 6×
• Horwitz v. Southwest Forest Industries, Inc.
  D. Nevada· 1985-03-20· cited 6×
• Jones v. Free
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1967-01-09· cited 3×