· 6/6/2005
Smith v. Educational Credit Management Corp.
Citations
- 328 B.R. 605
- 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 973
- 2005 WL 1322991
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding imputation was not proper when the record did not show that such expenses had been incurred in the past
- reversing findings of lower court which discharged debtors' student loans based on future prospects for an increase in debtors' income as their child got older
- reversing findings of lower court which discharged debtors’ student loans based on future prospects for an increase in debtors’ income as their child got older
- using figure of 4.3 weeks per month to determine correct amount of monthly income
- using figure of 4.3 weeks per month to determine correct amount of monthly income
- debtors not entitled to undue hardship determination despite having child with special medical needs that necessitate limited work hours
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lamoutte, Haines
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.