Smith v. Education People, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[P]ro se parties are afforded greater leniency in considering whether or not to impose Rule 11 sanctions.”
• “It is well established that Rule 11 [of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure] applies to pro se litigants.”
• “[Plaintiffs’] status as pro se litigants does not insulate them from the imposition of sanctions by this court under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.”
• collecting cases from the Second and Eleventh Circuits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Smith v. Scalia
  District of Columbia· 2014-05-26· cited 103×
• Benitez v. King
  W.D. New York· 2018-03-28· cited 20×

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Haines v. Kerner
  Supreme Court· 1972-02-22· cited 26,103×
• Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory Council
  Supreme Court· 1993-01-12· cited 2,320×
• Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1991-02-26· cited 811×
• Eastway Construction Corp. v. City of New York
  Second Circuit· 1985-05-21· cited 405×
• Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 1997-09-25· cited 138×
• Maharaj v. Bankamerica Corp.
  Second Circuit· 1997-10-17· cited 105×
• James Thomas Patterson, Sr. v. Lawrence L. Aiken
  Eleventh Circuit· 1988-03-28· cited 68×
• Sassower v. Field
  Second Circuit· 1992-08-13· cited 49×
• Abdullah v. Gatto
  Second Circuit· 1985-10-04· cited 46×
• Tuvia Ben Shmuel Yosef v. The Passamaquoddy Tribe, the Penobscot Nation, the Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians, and the Shawmut Bank of Boston
  Second Circuit· 1989-05-26· cited 42×
• Edward C. KING, Appellant, v. Lawrence A. FOX, Appellee
  Second Circuit· 2005-08-02· cited 30×
• Posner v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.
  E.D. New York· 1989-05-19· cited 30×
• Commer v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees
  S.D. New York· 2003-07-17· cited 10×
• Durant v. Traditional Investments, Ltd.
  S.D. New York· 1991-02-26· cited 10×
• Baasch v. Reyer
  E.D. New York· 1993-08-10· cited 9×
• Whimsicality, Inc. v. Battat
  S.D. New York· 1998-11-23· cited 8×
• Maduakolam v. Columbia University
  Second Circuit· 1989-01-23· cited 7×