Skip to main content
· 10/17/1997

Maharaj v. Bankamerica Corp.

Citations

  • 128 F.3d 94
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 28763

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the standards for res judicata are identical under New York and federal law
  • “the first judgment will preclude a second suit only when it involves the same ‘transaction’ or connected series of transactions as the earlier suit”
  • “final judgment on the merits of an action precludes the parties or their privies from relitigating issues that were or could have been raised in that action.”
  • “Under both New York law and federal law, the doctrine of res judicata, or claim preclusion, provides that ‘[a] final judgment on the merits of an action precludes the parties or their privies from relitigating issues that were or could have been raised in that action.’”
  • detailing both New York and federal law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.