E.D. Arkansas· 11/26/2003
Smith v. Duke
Citations
- 296 F. Supp. 2d 965
- 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22925
- 2003 WL 23096503
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Reading the whole act in context, I simply cannot find failure to exhaust administrative remedies, without more, within the scope of § 1915(g).” (emphasis added)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wilson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1989-05-01· cited 22,300×
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court· 1994-06-24· cited 15,294×
- Booth v. ChurnerSupreme Court· 2001-05-29· cited 3,581×
- Rivera v. AllinEleventh Circuit· 1998-06-23· cited 361×
- Raymond W. Snider v. Dr. MelindezSecond Circuit· 1999-12-08· cited 251×
- Patton v. Jefferson Correctional CenterFifth Circuit· 1998-03-16· cited 216×
- Keith Walker v. Herb Maschner Jim Helling John Emmett Bernard Eaves C/o Keigle C/o Mercer Debbie Nichols, Unit ManagerEighth Circuit· 2001-11-02· cited 13×
- Henry v. Medical Department at SCI-DallasM.D. Pennsylvania· 2001-04-26· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.