Smith v. Davis
Citations
- 187 F. 40
- 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5208
- 109 C.C.A. 94
Syllabus
<p>1. Collision (§ 29*) — Sailing Vessels — Navigation Rules — “Wind Aft.”</p> <p>Within the meaning of International Navigation Rules, art. 17, subd. e, 26 Stat. 326 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 2869), which provides that the one of two sailing vessels which has the wind aft shall keep out of the way of the other, a vessel has the “wind aft’’ when it is not more than 2% points from directly aft.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Collision, Cent. Dig. § 27; Dee. Dig. § 29.*]</p> <p>2. Courts (§ 98*) — International Rules — Construction—English Precedents.</p> <p>It is essential to the effectiveness of the international navigation rules that there should be close conformity between the admiralty courts of England and the United States in the interpretation of such rules, and for that reason, as well as because of the eminent ability of the judges composing them, the admiralty decisions of the higher English courts are given high consideration as precedents by the admiralty courts of the United States.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Courts, Dec. Dig. § 98.*]</p> <p>3. Collision (§ 136*) — Damages Recoverable — Detention of Vessel.</p> <p>Where a vessel was injured in a collision, for which the other vessel was in fault, during a voyage, and her detention was not such as to require the discharge of her crew or prevent her from completing her voyage, the rule is settled that the agreed demurrage under her charter may properly be accepted as fixing prima facie, the amount of her damages fdr the detention.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other eases, see Collision, Dee. Dig. § 136.*]</p> <p>4. Collision (§ 154*) — Action—Costs—Amount Paid for Surety Bond for Release of Vessel.</p> <p>The amount paid by the owners of a vessel libeled for collision to a surety company for furnishing stipulation for discharge of the vessel is not taxable as costs against the other party on his failure to recover.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Collision, Dee. Dig. § 154.*]</p
Judges: Putnam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Newton v. Consolidated Gas Co. of NYSupreme Court· 1924-05-12· cited 99×
- Howard Farmer v. Arabian American Oil CompanySecond Circuit· 1963-11-06· cited 39×
- Bank of America v. Loew's International CorporationS.D. New York· 1958-06-25· cited 34×
- Williams v. Sawyer Bros.Second Circuit· 1931-07-17· cited 27×
- Commerce Oil Refining Corp. v. MinerD. Rhode Island· 1961-09-29· cited 13×
- The TexasThird Circuit· 1915-10-04· cited 13×
- Parkerson v. BorstFifth Circuit· 1919-04-05· cited 13×
- New York & Oriental S. S. Co. v. Automobile Ins. Co. of HartfordSecond Circuit· 1930-01-20· cited 10×
- Hahlo v. BenedictSecond Circuit· 1914-06-11· cited 9×
- Crowe v. Peaslee-Gaulbert Co.First Circuit· 1930-01-15· cited 6×
- Sutton v. Pacific S. S. Co.W.D. Washington· 1924-11-26· cited 5×
- Interlake S. S. Co. v. 251,000 Bushels of No. 2 Mixed CornE.D. Michigan· 1927-04-02· cited 4×
- Jenkins Petroleum Process Co. v. Sinclair Refining Co.D. Maine· 1939-03-14· cited 3×
- The Walter AdamsD. Rhode Island· 1921-03-09· cited 3×
- Kroger Grocery & Baking Co. v. MartinSixth Circuit· 1938-06-09· cited 2×
- The RelianceD. Rhode Island· 1911-03-13· cited 2×
- Davis v. SmithD. Massachusetts· 1912-04-03· cited 2×
- Mount Vernon Co. v. Rowe Transfer & Storage Co.E.D. Tennessee· 1962-03-29· cited 1×
- The Gov. AmesD. Massachusetts· 1912-04-03· cited 1×
- The BrandThird Circuit· 1915-06-28· cited 1×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.