Supreme Court· 5/4/1885
Ex Parte Hughes
Citations
- 114 U.S. 548
- 5 S. Ct. 1008
- 29 L. Ed. 281
- 1885 U.S. LEXIS 1792
Syllabus
<p>The respondent in an original petition to- this court for a writ of mandamus which is denied, cannot tax as costs his disbursements for printing briefs: but a docket fee and disbursements for printing objections in the nature of pleadings, are taxable.</p>
Judges: Waite
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Smith v. DavisFirst Circuit· 1910-12-28· cited 29×
- Lee Injector Mfg. Co. v. Penberthy Injector Co.Sixth Circuit· 1901-06-15· cited 16×
- Kelly v. Springfield Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio· 1897-09-14· cited 10×
- Stein v. Expert Lamp Co.N.D. Illinois· 1952-07-08· cited 3×
- Price v. GarlandNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1889-01-15· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.