Smith v. Clackamas County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• nonfarm dwellings permitted only on EFU land “generally unsuitable” for farm production.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Von Lubken v. Hood River County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-12-19· cited 9×
• Clark v. Jackson County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-12-04· cited 4×
• Smith v. Clackamas County
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1992-07-09· cited 4×
• Department of Land Conservation & Development v. Coos County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-07-01· cited 1×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Wasco County Court
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1985-07-09· cited 51×
• Meyer v. Lord
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-11-06· cited 29×
• McCaw Communications, Inc. v. Marion County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-05-17· cited 17×
• Hopper v. Clackamas County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-09-02· cited 8×
• Flury v. Land Use Board of Appeals
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-02-03· cited 8×
• Lemmon v. Clemens
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-06-09· cited 6×
• Clark v. Jackson County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-12-04· cited 4×
• Hearne v. Baker County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-01-27· cited 4×
• Denison v. Douglas County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-04-04· cited 3×