McCaw Communications, Inc. v. Marion County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[S]tate and local provisions [defining nonfarm uses permitted in farm zones] must be construed, to the extent possible, as being consistent with the overriding policy of preventing agricultural land from being diverted to non-agricultural use.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Utsey v. Coos County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-09-26· cited 42×
• Nynex Mob. Comm. Co. v. Hazlet Tp.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1994-06-17· cited 24×
• Central Oregon LandWatch v. Deschutes County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-05-03· cited 14×
• Nelson v. Benton County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-10-14· cited 7×
• Smith v. Clackamas County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-12-04· cited 4×
• Waker Associates, Inc. v. Clackamas County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-02-12· cited 4×
• Von Lubken v. Hood River County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-02-17· cited 4×
• Stop Dump Coalition v. Yamhill County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-03-22· cited 3×
• Dayton Prairie Water Ass'n v. Yamhill County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-09-27· cited 2×
• Keicher v. Clackamas County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-08-08· cited 1×
• Greuner v. Lane County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-10-09
• Sprint PCS v. Washington County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-02-19

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• McCoy v. Linn County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-04-06· cited 11×
• Hopper v. Clackamas County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-09-02· cited 8×