Skip to main content
S.D. Illinois· 10/27/2017

Smith v. Brown

Citations

  • 296 F. Supp. 3d 648

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that cases where employees were found acting for wholly personal motives typically have “involved sexual gratification”
  • upholding the Government's certification that the defendant was acting within scope of employment where the defendant physically assaulted the plaintiff at a work party as the plaintiff had not sufficiently shown defendant acted on personal motives or animosity
  • “[T]here is no viable claim under the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment because ‘the Eighth Amendment applies only to convicted prisoners.’”
  • “[T]here is no viable claim under the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment because ‘the Eighth Amendment applies only to convicted prisoners.’”
  • “[W]hen a federal employee is injured on the job, FECA provides the exclusive remedy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gorenstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.