Smith v. Black & Decker (U.S.), Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no abuse of discretion by the trial court in barring the testimony of witnesses who were not disclosed in a timely fashion
• no abuse of discretion by the trial court in barring the testimony of witnesses who were not disclosed in a timely fashion
• no abuse of discretion by the trial court in barring the testimony of witnesses who were not disclosed in a timely fashion
• correspondence inadmissible because it failed to discredit witness on a material matter
• correspondence inadmissible because it failed to discredit witness on a material matter
• “We note that evidentiary rulings rest within the sound discretion of the trial court, and absent an abuse of discretion resulting in prejudice to the party objecting, those rulings will not be disturbed on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).