Marut v. Costello

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence is relevant if it “tends to prove a fact in controversy or renders a matter in issue more or less probable”
• holding that evidence is relevant if it \tends to prove a fact in controversy or renders a matter in issue more or less probable\
• holding that evidence is relevant if it “tends to prove a fact in controversy or renders a matter in issue more or less probable”
• relevancy “established where a fact offered tends to prove a fact in controversy or renders a matter in issue more or less probable”
• relevancy \established where a fact offered tends to prove a fact in controversy or renders a matter in issue more or less probable\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).