Skip to main content
W.D. Michigan· 7/7/2009

Smith v. Astrue

Citations

  • 639 F. Supp. 2d 836
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57682
  • 2009 WL 1992538

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that district-court decisions, whether published in the Federal Supplement books or not, are not binding
  • noting that a court may consider whether the application of persuasive authority would lead to an absurd or inequitable result
  • “like judges throughout the Sixth Circuit, this court regularly discusses nonprecedential decisions when they can illuminate an issue.”
  • “like judges throughout the Sixth Circuit, this court regularly discusses nonprecedential decisions when they can illuminate an issue.”
  • “[U]npublished decisions of the Sixth Circuit do not bind anyone except the parties to those particular cases . . . .”
  • “like judges throughout the Sixth Circuit, this court regularly discusses nonprecedential decisions when they can illuminate an issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Paul L. Maloney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.