Skip to main content
· 10/17/1986

Smith v. Airoom, Inc.

Citations

  • 499 N.E.2d 1381
  • 114 Ill. 2d 209
  • 102 Ill. Dec. 368
  • 1986 Ill. LEXIS 332

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying section 2-1401 petition solely on the element of due diligence in defending against claims in original action
  • noting that a party must establish all three elements to warrant relief under section 2-1401
  • explaining that relief under section 2-1401 requires a showing of “a meritorious defense - 10 - 2025 IL App (2d) 240314 or claim” and due diligence in both the original action and in bringing the motion
  • concluding “[w]hen all of the circumstances of this case are viewed in their entirety, there is no doubt that [the litigant’s] dilemma is the result of its own negligence and indifference to or disregard of the circuit court’s process.”
  • noting the plaintiff was not required to notify defendant of a motion where defendant failed to file an appearance
  • noting, in determining the reasonableness of an excuse, all circumstances must be considered, including the conduct of the litigants and their attorneys

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ryan, Moran

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.