Skip to main content
Ohio Supreme Court· 3/21/1990

Smith v. 10th Inning, Inc.

Citations

  • 49 Ohio St. 3d 289
  • 551 N.E.2d 1296
  • 1990 Ohio LEXIS 125

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “an intoxicated patron has no cause of action against a liquor permit holder” where the off-premises injury “was proximately caused by the patron’s intoxication”
  • intoxicated person has no cause of action against liquor permit holder for damages where injury was proximately caused by patron's own intoxication
  • Intoxicated patron has no cause of action against a liquor permit holder where the injury sustained by the patron off the premises of the permit holder was proximately caused by the patron's own intoxication.
  • Supreme Court of Ohio held that an intoxicated patron has no cause of action against a liquor permit holder where the injury sustained by the patron off the premises of the permit holder was proximately caused by the patron’s own intoxication

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Smith v. 10th Inning, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.