Herrly v. Muzik

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in action under dram shop act, complicity is absolute bar to recovery despite amendment incorporating comparative negligence statute
• in action under dram shop act, complicity is absolute bar to recovery despite amendment incorporating comparative negligence statute
• after Minnesota had enacted a comparative negligence law and the dram shop statute had been amended to include a reference to that law, the court decided that notwithstanding the adoption of comparative negligence, complicity acts as a complete bar to recovery
• after Minnesota had enacted a comparative negligence law and the dram shop statute had been amended to include a reference to that law, the court decided that notwithstanding the adoption of comparative negligence, complicity acts as a complete bar to recovery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Friedman v. Commissioner of Public Safety
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1991-08-15· cited 177×
• Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enterprises, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-07-23· cited 117×
• Anderson v. Moulder
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1990-05-18· cited 101×
• Craig v. Larson
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1989-05-09· cited 55×
• Urban v. American Legion Department of Minnesota
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-10-19· cited 39×
• Baxter Ex Rel. Estate of Baxter v. Noce
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1988-03-16· cited 37×
• Aanenson v. Bastien
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1989-03-21· cited 36×
• Smith v. 10th Inning, Inc.
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-03-21· cited 36×
• Robbins v. McCarthy
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1991-11-19· cited 27×
• Del E. Webb v. Superior Court of Arizona
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1986-09-17· cited 20×
• State v. Scovel
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2018-08-15· cited 19×
• Paulson v. Lapa, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1990-01-23· cited 16×
• Friedlander v. Edwards Lifesciences, LLC
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2017-08-09· cited 15×
• K.R. v. Sanford
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-02-03· cited 14×
• Grady v. Cedar Side Inn, Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2000-03-03· cited 11×
• Kuiawinski v. Palm Garden Bar
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-09-02· cited 8×
• Mason v. BCK Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-07-05· cited 8×
• Englund v. MN CA Partners/MN Joint Ventures
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1997-01-15· cited 5×
• Minnegasco, Inc. v. County of Carver
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-11-17· cited 5×
• K.R. v. Sanford
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1999-02-03· cited 5×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Beck v. Groe
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1955-05-27· cited 122×
• Hahn v. City of Ortonville
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1953-02-20· cited 64×
• Randall v. Village of Excelsior
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1960-05-06· cited 53×
• Holmquist v. Miller
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-05-03· cited 38×
• Turk v. Long Branch Saloon, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1968-06-21· cited 27×
• Robinson v. Lamott
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-07-13· cited 25×
• Meany v. Newell
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-05-03· cited 25×
• Heveron v. Village of Belgrade
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1970-11-06· cited 21×
• Martinson v. Monticello Municipal Liquors
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1973-07-20· cited 18×
• Hempstead v. Minneapolis Sheraton Corporation
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1969-03-07· cited 15×
• Pautz v. Cal-Ros, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-11-23· cited 11×
• Johnson v. Helary, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-01-13· cited 4×
• Herrly v. Muzik
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-10-02· cited 4×

Other cases named Herrly v. Muzik

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Herrly v. Muzik
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-10-02· cited 4×
• Herrly v. Muzik
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-02-15