Smith Barney Inc. v. Potter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \The hoariest principle of appellate review is that every presumption is in favor of the ruling of the trial court.\
• “In the absence of stated reasoning by the trial judge, an appellate court presumes that all intermediary conclusions in the chain of logic were resolved in favor of the ultimate conclusion of the trial court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).