Indiana Supreme Court· 10/19/2000

Small v. State

Citations

736 N.E.2d 742
2000 Ind. LEXIS 975
2000 WL 1563024

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a defendant cannot object on one ground at trial and then raise a different claim of error on appeal
concluding that defendant waived confrontation issue where his trial objection was based solely on argument that testimony was hearsay
holding, where the defendant argued his right to confront witnesses was violated, that the defendant did not object on confrontation grounds at trial and that the claim of error was waived
holding, where the defendant contended that his right to confront witnesses was violated, that the defendant did not object on confrontation grounds at trial and that the claim of error was waived
observing “a trial court has no affirmative duty to admonish a jury sua sponte as to such evidentiary matters”
observing “a trial court has no affirmative duty to admonish a jury sua sponte as to such evidentiary matters”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan, Shepard, Dickson, Boehm, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.