Skip to main content

Lake v. State

Citations

  • 565 N.E.2d 332
  • 1991 Ind. LEXIS 3
  • 1991 WL 6209

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that where defense counsel was present and did not call into question trial court’s manner of handling jury, no error was preserved for appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Debruler, Dickson, Givan, Krahulik, Shepard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.