California Court of Appeal· 9/19/2006
Slovensky v. Friedman
Citations
- 49 Cal. Rptr. 3d 60
- 142 Cal. App. 4th 1518
- 2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8904
- 2006 Daily Journal DAR 12693
- 2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1438
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Disgorgement of fees may be appropriate remedy for an attorney’s breach of fiduciary duty”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sims, Blease, Cantil-Sakauye
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Prakashpalan v. Engstrom, Lipscomb & LackCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2014-02-11· cited 150×
- Platt Electrical Supply, Inc. v. Eoff Electrical, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2008-04-15· cited 137×
- Wallace v. McCubbinCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2011-06-27· cited 125×
- Filbin v. FitzgeraldCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2012-11-20· cited 78×
- Environmental Network Corp. v. MillerOhio Supreme Court· 2008-08-06· cited 61×
- Gutierrez v. GirardiCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2011-04-27· cited 59×
- Thomson v. CanyonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2011-07-22· cited 53×
- Alexander v. Exxon MobilCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2013-09-24· cited 37×
- Clark v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaD. New Jersey· 2013-04-18· cited 28×
- Jenni Rivera Enters., LLC v. Latin World Entm't Holdings, Inc.California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2019-05-29· cited 24×
- Ash v. North American Title Co.California Court of Appeal· 2014-02-18· cited 19×
- UDC-Universal Development, L.P v. CH2M HillCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2010-01-15· cited 18×
- Parrish v. National Football League Players Ass'nN.D. California· 2007-09-06· cited 14×
- James River Insurance v. Bodywell Nutrition, LLCS.D. Florida· 2012-02-01· cited 10×
- Clark v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaD. New Jersey· 2013-02-05· cited 9×
- Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP v. J-M Mfg. Co.California Court of Appeals, 2nd District· 2016-01-29· cited 4×
- Hammel v. McCullochCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-04-03· cited 3×
- Estakhrian v. ObenstineC.D. California· 2017-01-29· cited 3×
- Pearce v. RomeoNinth Circuit· 2008-11-03· cited 1×
- Prakashpalan v. Engstrom, Lipscomb & LackCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2014-02-27
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court· 2001-07-11· cited 2,941×
- Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court· 1999-08-16· cited 726×
- Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.California Supreme Court· 2005-05-09· cited 667×
- Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.California Supreme Court· 2001-08-06· cited 637×
- Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court· 1988-04-07· cited 622×
- Neighbours v. Buzz Oates EnterprisesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1990-01-22· cited 214×
- FPI Development, Inc. v. NakashimaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1991-06-19· cited 163×
- San Diego Watercrafts, Inc. v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2002-10-09· cited 126×
- Stanley v. RichmondCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1995-06-14· cited 126×
- United Community Church v. GarcinCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1991-06-19· cited 118×
- Kurinij v. Hanna & MortonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1997-06-10· cited 113×
- Brown v. BorenCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1999-09-17· cited 94×
- McDowell v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1997-12-09· cited 75×
- Beery v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court· 1987-08-20· cited 48×
- Clark v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.California Court of Appeal· 2000-10-20· cited 48×
- In Re FountainCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1977-11-04· cited 23×
- Frye v. Tenderloin Housing Clinic, Inc.California Supreme Court· 2006-03-09· cited 22×
- Cox v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1970-01-07· cited 20×
- Barnard v. LangerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2003-06-25· cited 19×
- Ward v. Westinghouse Canada, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1994-08-18· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.