Slayko v. Security Mutual Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]hen statutes and Insurance Department regulations are silent, we are reluctant to inhibit freedom of contract by finding insurance policy clauses violative of public policy.”
• courts \are reluctant to inhibit freedom of contract by finding insurance policy clauses violative of public policy\
• “Cases involving auto insurance coverage-an area in which the contractual relationship and many of its terms are prescribed by law-provide a weak basis for generalization about ... other insurance contracts.”
• “more than a causal connection between the intentional act and the resultant harm is required to prove that the harm was intended” under an intentional acts exclusion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).