Skirvin v. Mesta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that where the necessity for a receiver has ceased to exist, the receivership should be discharged
• “[t]he power to . . . terminate a receivership no longer needed is a necessary incident to the power to appoint in the first instance”
• “[T]he power to appoint a receiver with authority to take custody and control of property and operate it as a going concern is a delicate one which is jealously safeguarded, and it should be exerted sparingly”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).