Thomas P. Florida v. United States of America, Andrew J. Florida v. United States of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• pending refund suits in District Court do not prevent Government action in different District Court to enforce payment of taxes
• pending refund suits in District Court do not prevent Government action in different District Court to enforce payment of taxes
• construing § 1292(a)(2) strictly and disposing of argument that an expansion order was “in practical effect the appointment of a re- ceiver”
• referring to an amended court’s order that provided: “The receiver appointed herein is hereby vested with all of the rights and powers with respect to said stock, including voting rights, which could be exercised by the owners of said stock at this time”.
• referring to an amended court’s order that provided: “The receiver appointed herein is hereby vested with all of the rights and powers with respect to said stock, including voting rights, which could be exercised by the owners of said stock at this time[.]”
• non-appealable interlocutory orders entered subsequent to an appealable order are not open for consideration upon appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).