Skip to main content
· 12/2/1996

Siwik v. Marshall Field & Co.

Citations

  • 945 F. Supp. 1158
  • 154 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2510
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17914
  • 70 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,647
  • 80 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 397
  • 1996 WL 691413

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • allowing statute of limitations defense even though defendant raised it in summary judgment motion rather than by “literally s[eeking] leave to amend under Rule 15(a)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shadur

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.