Sisk v. State

Citations

• 35 Tex. 495

Syllabus

<p>.Appellant having been convicted of a charge of “rudely displaying pistols,” founded on the act of October 26, 1866 (Acts, p. 60), which was intended as a substitute for Article 2012, Paschal’s Digest, it is insisted in this court that the act is void for uncertainty and for want of completeness.. Held, that the meaning of the enactment is plain, and the objection cannot be sustained.</p>