Skip to main content
· 5/13/1963

Sisemore v. Neal

Citations

  • 367 S.W.2d 417
  • 236 Ark. 574
  • 12 A.L.R. 3d 929
  • 1963 Ark. LEXIS 667

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • The court affirmed a judgment dismissing a husband's loss-of-consortium action because it was derivative in nature and, thus, was barred by the adverse judgment in his wife's personal-injury action.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.