Lund v. Caple

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the injured spouse need not be joined in the action
• holding an 5 IIED claim against a pastor who slept with the plaintiff’s wife was “fatal[ly] flaw[ed]” 6 because the plaintiff was not present at the time of the affair
• conceivable that a malpractice action would be appropriate where a counselor fails to conform to an appropriate standard of care, injuring the spouse who is a patient and thereby causing loss of consortium damages to the other spouse

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).