Siomkin v. Fairchild Camera & Instrument Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpretive bulletins from the Wage and Hour Administrator are not regulations and do not have the force of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Albert E. Andrews, III v. Lt. General William Knowlton, Etc., William H. White v. Lt. General William Knowlton, Etc.
  Second Circuit· 1975-01-16· cited 21×
• Brock v. Two \R\ Drilling Co.
  Fifth Circuit· 1986-05-19· cited 10×
• Weninger v. Gen. Mills Operations LLC
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2018-09-25· cited 9×
• Winans v. W.A.S., Inc.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1989-05-11· cited 8×
• Winans v. W.A.S., Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1988-08-01· cited 4×
• Lemm v. Ecolab
  California Court of Appeal· 2023-01-03

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. Missel
  Supreme Court· 1942-06-08· cited 823×

Other cases named Siomkin v. Fairchild Camera & Instrument Corp.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Siomkin v. Fairchild Camera & Instrument Corp.
  E.D. New York· 1948-01-30· cited 1×