Albert E. Andrews, III v. Lt. General William Knowlton, Etc., William H. White v. Lt. General William Knowlton, Etc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the Academy's decision to dismiss a cadet or impose a separation would be \immune from constitutional infirmity\ so long as the Wasson requirements were met
• discussing requisites of due process where a West Point cadet faces separation from the academy for violating the honor code
• discussing the deference to military proceedings in light of the \constitutional permissibility of the military to set and enforce uncommonly high standards of conduct and ethics\
• “[W]e recognize the constitutional permissibility of the military to set and enforce uncommonly high standards of conduct and ethics.”
• “The Cadet Honor Code in force at the United States Military Academy consists of a single maxim: ‘A cadet does not lie, cheat or steal or tolerate those who do.’”
• West Point’s sole penalty of expulsion does not offend due process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).