District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 3/15/1985
Singleton v. United States
Citations
- 488 A.2d 1365
- 1985 D.C. App. LEXIS 338
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding sufficient evidence to permit the jury to infer an intent to rob, where testimony was presented that the victim was attacked from behind, and his assailant repeatedly grabbed at the back of his pants, i.e., where most men keep their wallet
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Belson, Nebeker, Ferren, Bel-Son
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Owens v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-08-30· cited 81×
- Morris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-03-30· cited 35×
- Carter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2008-09-18· cited 26×
- Feaster v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-11-16· cited 23×
- Long v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-10-28· cited 16×
- Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1987-01-07· cited 13×
- McNeil v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-10-04· cited 13×
- Abdus-Price v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-04-21· cited 11×
- Matthews v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-02-24· cited 10×
- In re T.H.B.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-01-25· cited 10×
- Snowden v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-09-20· cited 8×
- Alexander v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1998-09-24· cited 5×
- MICHAEL SANDERS v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2015-07-02· cited 3×
- In Re THBDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-01-25
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court· 1976-06-17· cited 4,773×
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 2,732×
- United States v. HastingSupreme Court· 1983-05-23· cited 1,999×
- Jenkins v. AndersonSupreme Court· 1980-06-10· cited 1,359×
- Fletcher v. WeirSupreme Court· 1982-03-23· cited 749×
- Frank Daniel Williams v. Robert F. Zahradnick and the Attorney General of the State of VirginiaFourth Circuit· 1980-10-02· cited 108×
- United States v. Robert Paul EdwardsFifth Circuit· 1978-07-21· cited 70×
- Jennings v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1981-05-21· cited 54×
- United States v. Anthony MavrickSeventh Circuit· 1979-06-29· cited 47×
- United States v. CovingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-05-05· cited 26×
- United States of America, Ex Rel., Larry Saulsbury v. James Greer, Warden, Menard, Michael Lane, Director of the Department of CorrectionsSeventh Circuit· 1983-03-14· cited 23×
- Anthony M. Accardo v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1957-12-04· cited 17×
- Walker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-05-25· cited 15×
- James Horace Reid v. Walter Riddle, Superintendent, Virginia State PenitentiaryFourth Circuit· 1977-03-10· cited 13×
- Dowtin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1975-01-16· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.