Singleton v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that as to claim at issue, “the claim of misadvice does not depend on ‘facts’ that ‘could not have been ascertained by the exercise of due diligence’ and the exception in rule 3.850(b)(1
• finding defendant's motion timely because it was filed before prior case law was superseded by Ey

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Chandler v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-01-14· cited 14×
• Tatum v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-01-20· cited 4×
• Flint v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-05-13· cited 2×
• Conionilli v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-04-08· cited 2×
• MacK v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-12-17

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Green
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2006-10-26· cited 150×
• Cottle v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1999-04-08· cited 111×
• Ey v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2008-02-28· cited 33×
• Spradley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-03-12· cited 7×
• Beasley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-06-20· cited 7×
• Galindez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-02· cited 6×
• Hall v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-11-19· cited 6×
• Boykins v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-03-26· cited 5×
• Douglas v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-03-28· cited 3×