Skip to main content

Chandler v. State

Citations

  • 1 So. 3d 284
  • 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 189
  • 2009 WL 80221

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that Ey v. State, 982 So.2d 618, 624 (Fla.2008), superseded Second District Court of Appeal’s decisions to the contrary
  • recognizing that Ey v. State, 982 So.2d 618, 624 (Fla.2008), superseded the second district’s cases to the contrary
  • recognizing that Ey overruled the second district’s cases to the contrary and that the two-year time limit begins to run from the date the conviction becomes final and not from the time the defendant learns of misadvice
  • recognizing that Ey overruled the second district's cases to the contrary and that the two-year time limit begins to run from the date the conviction becomes final and not from the time the defendant learns of misadvice
  • failure to advise defendant that plea would subject him to conditional release upon his release from imprisonment
  • “[U]n-der the law in effect when Chandler filed his motion ... this court would have found Chandler’s motion to be timely. Accordingly, under Ey, his motion should be deemed timely and considered on its merits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Villanti, Kelly, Khouzam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.