Simmons v. State
Citations
- 105 Miss. 48
- 61 So. 827
Syllabus
<p>1. Criminal Law. Rape. Complaint. Res gestae. Instructions. Expert testimony. Condition of female.</p> <p>In a prosecution for rape upon a child less than twelve years of age, statements made by the child to physicians five and seven days after the occurrence that she had been raped are inadmissible as being hearsay and not a part of the res gestae.</p> <p>2. Criminal Law. Instructions.</p> <p>An instruction for the state in a prosecution for rape that if the jury believe from the evidence and circumstances in evidence that the defendant feloniously had intercourse with his daughter, a female under the age of twelve years, then he is guilty, is erroneous.</p> <p>3. Same.</p> <p>An instruction for the state in a prosecution for rape, .that the crime of rape may be proven by circumstances, and it is not necessary to have an eyewitness to the deed, if the circumstances in evidence are sufficient to create in the minds of the jury a belief that the accused party is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, is erroneous.</p> <p>4. Same.</p> <p>An instruction for the state in a prosecution for rape, that a female child less than twelve years of age cannot consent to sexual intercourse, and if a man has intercourse with such child, voluntarily, so far as he is concerned, then he would be guilty of rape, regardless of whether the female consented or not, is erroneous.</p> <p>5. CbimiNal Law. Expert testimony. Condition of female.</p> <p>In a prosecution for rape a physician may testify as to the penetration and as to his opinion upon the possibility of the injury being caused by barbed wire fence. He may describe the physical condition of the girl and may testify how sexual intercourse would affect the organs of a child; but he may not testify as to whether or not, in his opinion, the injury was caused by sexual intercourse.</p>
Judges: Cook
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Holland v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1997-09-11· cited 380×
- Mitchell v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 2001-03-29· cited 168×
- Edmonds v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 2007-05-10· cited 103×
- Hall v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1989-02-09· cited 91×
- McGowen v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 2003-09-11· cited 86×
- Brooks v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1971-01-04· cited 50×
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 1999-03-23· cited 17×
- Simmons v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1915-03-15· cited 15×
- Kirkland v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1979-05-23· cited 2×
- Gerald James Holland v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court· 1993-04-02
- William Gerald Mitchell v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court· 1998-07-24
- Hugh Wilton McGowen, Jr. v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court· 2002-01-22
- Tyler Edmonds v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court· 2004-07-24
- Prestage v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1972-02-07
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.