Simmons v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where the jury did not request to have the testimony read and the reading of the testimony was impractical, the trial court did not abuse its discretion
• noting that a read-back taking seven hours was impractical
• impractical where type-written copy of the requested testimony was not available and court reporter physically incapable of reading seven hours of testimony back to jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kelley v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-04-10· cited 98×
• Hazuri v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2012-05-31· cited 28×
• Miller v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-09-01· cited 13×
• Roper v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-11-13· cited 12×
• DeCastro v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-07-11· cited 10×
• State v. Colbert
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-03-11· cited 3×
• Nakia Simmons v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-01-03

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wong Sun v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
• Richardson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1971-03-31· cited 927×
• State v. Melendez
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1971-02-03· cited 55×
• LaMonte v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1962-10-24· cited 22×
• Cole v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1967-05-31· cited 5×
• Penton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1958-10-17· cited 4×
• Marsland v. Julien
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-05-04· cited 1×