Cole v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding a statutory right to be present was validly waived where it was discussed in the defendant's presence and apparent that the defendant understood the right and acquiesced in the reason to be absent
• concluding a statutory right to be present was validly waived where it was discussed in the defendant's presence and apparent that the defendant understood the right and acquiesced in the reason to be absent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Melendez
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1971-02-03· cited 55×
• Simmons v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-04-27· cited 7×
• Henzel v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1968-06-18· cited 7×
• HARRIS (BARRY) v. WARDEN
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2024-05-30· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lowman v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1920-06-10· cited 40×
• Cole v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1966-01-11· cited 8×
• Cole v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1965-03-09· cited 4×