Skip to main content
· 3/27/2008

Sillah v. Mukasey

Citations

  • 519 F.3d 1042
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 6301
  • 2008 WL 795342

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that we had no jurisdiction to review an IJ’s timeliness determination because the petitioner’s arrival date was not an undisputed fact
  • holding that we had no jurisdiction to review an IJ’s timeliness determination because the petitioner’s arrival date was not an undisputed fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McKeown, Clifton, Schwarzer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.