Federal Circuit· 12/22/2010
Shum v. Intel Corp.
Citations
- 633 F.3d 1067
- 97 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1513
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 25964
- 2010 WL 5256637
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding unjust enrichment claim not precluded by parties’ written agreement where agreement covered conduct different from that underlying unjust enrichment claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Newman, Lourie, Prost
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Brilliant Instruments, Inc. v. Guidetech, LLC.Federal Circuit· 2013-02-20· cited 62×
- Thompson v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2011-10-13· cited 32×
- Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. v. A10 Networks, Inc.N.D. California· 2012-06-12· cited 20×
- Cumberland Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Mylan Institutional LLCFederal Circuit· 2017-01-26· cited 16×
- Copart, Inc. v. Sparta Consulting, Inc.E.D. California· 2017-09-26· cited 15×
- Intellectual Ventures I, LLC v. Motorola Mobility, LLCD. Delaware· 2014-10-28· cited 2×
- Davis Wetlands Bank, LLC v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2014-10-31· cited 1×
- Morningware, Inc. v. Hearthware Home Products, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 2012-09-26· cited 1×
- Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Inc. v. Technology Research Group, LLCN.D. Illinois· 2011-05-10
- Civix-Ddi, LLC v. Hotels. Com, LpN.D. Illinois· 2011-08-19
- Shum v. Intel Corp.Supreme Court· 2011-10-03
- NALTNER v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2024-10-29
Cites
40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court· 1988-06-17· cited 2,587×
- Lazar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1996-01-29· cited 731×
- Trauma Service Group v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 1997-01-16· cited 518×
- LiMandri v. JudkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1997-01-28· cited 302×
- Ethicon, Inc. And Inbae Yoon, M.D. v. United States Surgical Corporation and Young Jae ChoiFederal Circuit· 1998-04-01· cited 277×
- Wahpeton Canvas Co. v. Frontier, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1989-03-20· cited 256×
- City of Hope National Medical Center v. Genentech, Inc.California Supreme Court· 2008-04-24· cited 216×
- Eli Lilly and Company v. Aradigm Corporation, Defendant-CrossFederal Circuit· 2004-07-20· cited 207×
- Wall Street Network, Ltd. v. New York Times Co.California Court of Appeal· 2008-06-20· cited 189×
- Ginny v. White Jimmie D. White v. Ford Motor Company, a Delaware Corporation, and Orscheln Company, a Missouri CorporationNinth Circuit· 2002-12-03· cited 176×
- Warner Construction Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1970-03-31· cited 156×
- Nelson v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1999-06-14· cited 153×
- New York Life Insurance v. ViglasSupreme Court· 1936-03-30· cited 149×
- Fina Oil and Chemical Co. And Fina Technology, Inc. v. John A. Ewen v. Abbas Razavi, Intervenor-AppelleeFederal Circuit· 1997-09-02· cited 149×
- Lectrodryer v. SeoulBankCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2000-01-18· cited 147×
- Peterson v. Cellco PartnershipCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2008-06-26· cited 144×
- Oakland Raiders v. National Football LeagueCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2005-07-28· cited 130×
- Conrad v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1996-04-09· cited 77×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.