Skip to main content
Federal Circuit· 12/22/2010

Shum v. Intel Corp.

Citations

  • 633 F.3d 1067
  • 97 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1513
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 25964
  • 2010 WL 5256637

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding unjust enrichment claim not precluded by parties’ written agreement where agreement covered conduct different from that underlying unjust enrichment claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Lourie, Prost

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.