Fina Oil and Chemical Co. And Fina Technology, Inc. v. John A. Ewen v. Abbas Razavi, Intervenor-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a putative inventor with an ownership interest in the 7 patent in question has standing to pursue a § 256 claim
• \We apply [the well-pleaded complaint rule] not to the declaratory judgment complaint but to the hypothetical action the declaratory defendant would have brought.\
• “The determination of whether a person is a joint inventor is fact specific and no bright-line standard will suffice in every case.”
• “[A] joint inventor must contribute in some significant manner to the conception of the inven- tion.”
• “Like conception of the entire invention, a contribution to conception is a mental act which cannot be accurately verified without corroboration.”
• “[A] joint inventor must contribute in some significant manner to the conception of the inven- tion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).