E.D. Pennsylvania· 4/30/1998
Shubert v. Katz (In Re Katz)
Citations
- 220 B.R. 556
- 1998 Bankr. LEXIS 524
- 1998 WL 214584
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that when the debtor’s entire interest in a trust was protected by a valid spendthrift provision, the debtor could not assign his interest in either the principal or the income before they were distributed
- explaining that the law of the case doctrine is based on “the principal that courts will not reopen what has already been decided by them”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: David A. Scholl
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1983-03-30· cited 1,909×
- Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court· 1912-06-07· cited 891×
- Patterson v. ShumateSupreme Court· 1992-06-15· cited 884×
- Specht v. JensenTenth Circuit· 1988-08-03· cited 302×
- Marx & Co. v. Diners' Club, Inc.Second Circuit· 1977-02-25· cited 224×
- United States v. Lewis A. ZipkinSixth Circuit· 1984-03-07· cited 174×
- In the Matter of Gerald J. Ross, Also Known as Jerry Ross, Bankrupt. Gerald J. RossThird Circuit· 1979-07-26· cited 158×
- Raytech Corporation v. Earl WhiteThird Circuit· 1995-05-10· cited 95×
- Molecular Technology Corp. v. ValentineSixth Circuit· 1991-02-11· cited 62×
- Morgan'S EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1909-01-04· cited 53×
- Leitch v. Sanford Motor Truck Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1924-01-07· cited 47×
- Posner v. SheridanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-01-19· cited 42×
- Spencer v. Blanchard (In Re Blanchard)E.D. Pennsylvania· 1996-09-23· cited 35×
- Cowgill v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Third Circuit· 1987-11-06· cited 28×
- Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1963-06-04· cited 27×
- Kathleen ZICHY and Jane E. Schofer, Appellants, v. the CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, AppelleeThird Circuit· 1979-01-05· cited 24×
- Cole v. Sovran Mortgage Corp. (In Re Cole)E.D. Pennsylvania· 1988-07-19· cited 24×
- In Re AtallahE.D. Pennsylvania· 1989-01-18· cited 21×
- Croge v. Katz (In Re Katz)E.D. Pennsylvania· 1996-12-04· cited 21×
- Togut v. Hecht (In Re Hecht)S.D. New York· 1985-10-21· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.