Shubert v. Katz (In Re Katz)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when the debtor’s entire interest in a trust was protected by a valid spendthrift provision, the debtor could not assign his interest in either the principal or the income before they were distributed
• explaining that the law of the case doctrine is based on “the principal that courts will not reopen what has already been decided by them”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).