Spencer v. Blanchard (In Re Blanchard)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “[t]here is no question in this case that the Plaintiffs have been prevented from maintaining their rights in the furniture and equipment of the Centers which was sold by the Debtors.”
• explaining that, while single valuable pieces of household furnishings, as well as jewelry and other liquid assets, should be listed at fair market value, liquidation valuation may well be appropriate for general household goods
• undervaluing assets that would have been exempt was not material
• undervaluing assets that would have been exempt was not material
• undervaluing assets that would have been exempt was not material

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).